Sunday, April 17, 2016

Jill Ker Conway & Janet Frame

For these 20th century antipodean female writers, one an academic and the other arguably NZ's greatest novelist, the question of identity at the heart of their memoirs and autobiography stems from geography as well as gender and the century into which they were born.

One of the main themes common to both in the quest for identity, which, as in Malcolm X, spills into bigger questions for the reader of cultural identities and the so-called memories on which identity is constructed, is that of re-mapping the globe.

These videos are helpful discussion of the problem with western cartography:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho84D_HeaHY

http://www.upworthy.com/we-have-been-mislead-by-an-erroneous-map-of-the-world-for-500-years?c=bl3



Jill Ker Conway, The trilogy

The Road from Coorain is the first in a trilogy.  The second part is True North (again involving discovery of the self in relation to global mapping), and the third is A Woman's Education.  Parallel with the navigation of self is an exploration of the meaning and development of what it means to be female in post World War II society. 

Here Jill Ker Conway talks about her experiences as a leader of women's education:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QuO88X6WEk

 

Janet Frame, The House in Oamaru

Some pictures from the house in Eden St, Oamaru.  It is much tidier now that it is set up for visitors than it was when Janet and her sisters and brother lived there in all their happy chaos:











Jane Campion on meeting Janet Frame

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/jan/19/fiction5

Janet Frame's first novel, Owls Do Cry, created a sensation in New Zealand when it was published in 1957. It was hailed by some critics as the country's long-awaited first great novel, even "a masterpiece", and criticised by others for being too experimental - they hated the italicised internal monologue - and "too depressing". When I read it at 14, the same age as Daphne is in the novel - Daphne of "the Dead Room" - her dark, eloquent song captured my heart: "The day is early with birds beginning and the wren in a cloud piping like the child in the poem, drop thy pipe, thy happy pipe. And the place grows bean flower, pea-green lush of grass, swarm of insects dizzily hitting the high spots."

Frame gave Daphne this inner world of gorgeously imagined riches, but also affirmed it in me, and in countless other sensitive teenage girls: we had been given a voice - poetic, powerful and fated.

Owls Do Cry is based partly on events in Frame's life, including her experience of spending eight years in and out of mental asylums. It started many rumours and dark imaginings about her actual life. Some believed she was still in an asylum, perhaps having had a lobotomy. Others said she had gone overseas and was living anonymously.

Most weekends our family drove to our beach house in Plimmerton, passing the notorious Porirua asylum. "Was Janet Frame in Porirua?" I would ask, peering at the flat prison-like buildings surrounded by misshapen macrocarpas.


Sign up to our Bookmarks newsletter
 Read more
"No, not Porirua."

"Where?"

"Sunnyside."

"Sunnyside? They call a mental hospital Sunnyside? Is she still there?"

I looked on her life with admiration, pity and fear. To be in any way abnormal in New Zealand's closed society was a stigma; to be "mental" was an unrecoverable shame. Fifteen years later I was to become familiar with Porirua hospital, ward K2, as my mother tried repeatedly to find some relief from the terror and bleakness of her late-life depression.

Advertisement

In 1963, Frame returned to New Zealand and, partly because of the whispers and conjecture that continued to surround her life, decided to write the truth. She began the first volume of what turned out to be her three-volume autobiography, collected under the title An Angel at My Table. It is one of the most moving books I have ever read, and is, for me, the best book ever written by a New Zealander.

Frame achieved that supremely difficult task of finding a voice so natural it feels almost as if it were not written. Her autobiography does so much more than clarify her personal history of misdiagnosis - it tells us about her whole life, which was unexpectedly enchanted, but certainly tragic. Apart from the years she spent in and out of mental hospitals, two of her sisters died by drowning in unrelated incidents. I learned about the life-saving role writer Frank Sargeson played in offering her a place to live and teaching her how to survive as a writer. A later delight in the third volume was her love affairs, one on the island of Ibiza and another with a Spanish man who wore two-toned shoes. Her ability to write about her pain and humiliation as calmly and even-handedly as her successes disarmed me. I got to know her in intimate detail and loved her tenderly.

My mother sent me the first volume, entitled To the Island, in Sydney, where I was studying film-making at the Australian Film, Television and Radio School. The book had just been published - this was 1982 - and was not yet available in Australia. So, 14 years after first opening Owls Do Cry, I was once more sitting up in my bed, once more reading Janet Frame. And as I read, I sobbed. I was not only reading about Frame's life, I was also re-experiencing my own childhood, exploring emotional fault lines: long-running games of "Pioneers" with covered wagons made from vegetable boxes; rounders played in the Katherine Mansfield Memorial Park at the corner of our street; and the humiliation of being abandoned by Geoffrey Baird at the Queen Margaret College dance - retribution, he said, for having dropped him three weeks earlier.

Lying in bed that weekend in Sydney, I had the idea that a television series based on her story would make her work much better known. So, later that year, I went in search of Janet Frame.

I met her on December 24 1982. Back in New Zealand for Christmas, I drove my mother's car to Levin, to ask Frame for the rights to her autobiography. I was 28, and my godmother Marga Gordon, who knew Frame, had given me her address and arranged an appointment.

Levin is a flat, plain, neat country town, every house a brick or wood bungalow of identical size and style. Frame's house stood out from the others by virtue of its uncut golden coloured grass in the front yard and the extra layer of bricks she had put on the front wall in an attempt to soundproof it. It looked empty and derelict, and I was almost surprised when she answered the door. We were both nervous. I had brought her some fresh eggs, but they had broken when I braked too hard at a corner. As I began to tell her this story, she became alarmed.

"An accident? Oh dear, are you all right?"

"No, no not me, the eggs."

I got myself more and more deeply entangled.

"What eggs?"

Finally we stopped talking about the eggs and the accident and I told her how much I loved To the Island. Frame was not like anyone else I had met: she seemed freer, more energised, and absolutely sane. She was witty, unconventional in her manner, and she didn't seem to care about clothes or how she looked. I remember her house as being a bit of a mess: the kitchen was cluttered with dishes, and there was no door on the bathroom, just a curtain. She had a glamorous white Persian cat that we stroked and admired. Later she took me through the house and showed me how she worked. Each room and even parts of rooms were dedicated to a different book in progress. Here and there she had hung curtains to divide up the rooms like they do in hospital wards to give the patients privacy. On the desk where she had last been working was a pair of earmuffs.

"I can't bear any sound," she explained. "The double bricks haven't worked. I think I will have to move."

I checked my watch: I had been warned not to stay longer than an hour.

Frame sensibly suggested I wait until I had read the next two volumes of her autobiography, due out in 1983 and 1984. In the meantime, she would not sell them to anyone else. She liked boldness, she said, and made me hopeful despite my being just a student. Her taste in film was more sophisticated than mine. She talked about Last Year at Marienbad and said she favoured films with strong atmosphere.

The light was intensifying ahead of a thunderstorm and from somewhere we heard a rifle shot.

"The holiday spirit's begun early," she laughed.

"Are you doing anything special for Christmas?" I asked.

"Yes, I am going to spend it with some very old friends," she replied: "I am going to have Christmas with the Brontë sisters, Emily and Charlotte."

On another visit, two years later, this time with my friend and producer Bridget Ikin, we had tea in what Frame called her dining room, though we could see no table. Instead, there was a single bed with a pink candlewick cover. She sat on one side of the bed on a chair and we sat on the other, balancing our teas on our knees. The atmosphere was jolly, and it was only later that I realised it was as if we three were visiting someone in hospital, someone who wasn't present.

The last time I met Frame was when we were filming An Angel at My Table. The producers invited her to visit the set in Auckland. She travelled up from Levin with my godmother, whom I had given a small part in the film. Frame found a chair against the wall of the studio. She watched our work, and me, and I watched her, grateful for her tact and the permission she gave me simply to do my best. She wanted no control, and hardly ever commented or asked for changes, not then or through the long process of the adaptation by Laura Jones. Over the course of the week, however, Frame moved closer and closer to the action, until, on the Friday, the last day of her stay, she was sitting on the couch of the film-set Frame family house in Oamaru. The pink pages of the call sheet in her hands had all the new words from our world: "wrap time", "call time", "standby props" and "mag change". She enunciated these words slowly, as if tasting something new and curious.

The television series became a film, and I have often tried to think through why people loved it so particularly. At the Venice film festival, the reaction to it was unlike that to any other film of mine, before or after. At the screening, I had no feeling of how what was a very long film was going down. Sitting next to me was an elegant, tall Italian woman, tanned the colour of well-cooked bacon, wearing high-heeled sandals and a long, tight-fitting evening dress. She did not look like someone who would relate to a fuzzy red-headed, white-skinned New Zealander once known as Nini. I was too scared to look at her in case she was yawning. Near the end of the film, she grasped my arm and breathed, "Poverina, poverina". When I turned to look at her, wondering if the film was as hopeless as that, I saw large tear trails through her eyelashes and down her cheeks. She was desperate to know if Frame would be all right in the end. As the credits rolled, this elegant stranger embraced me, kissing my face and smearing it with her tears: "Brava! Bellissima!"

It was not the best film at the festival, but it was the most loved. When it was awarded the second prize, the Silver Lion, the crowd wouldn't allow the head of the jury to announce the winner. For 10 minutes they chanted, "Angel, Angel, Angel, Angel". The only other New Zealander there to witness the film's success was the sales agent for the New Zealand Film Commission, who early on had made sure I understood that I was not to order room service as it was extra and expensive, and nor was I to imagine that Roberto Cicutto, our Italian distributor, was flirting with me, as he was gay. This same man, though, was the film's saviour, responsible for the series becoming a film, and for the film being at the festival in the first place.

I never saw Janet Frame again, yet my understanding of her and her devotion to writing, her gift, is still unfolding in me. I see now that she was not, as I sometimes thought, lonely, but lived in a rare state of freedom, removed from the demands and conventions of a husband, children and a narrow social world. Near the end of her life in 2003, when she was diagnosed with acute leukaemia, she was reported to have said that her death was an adventure, "and I've always enjoyed adventures".

Little Nini, the adventure-loving, practical, red-haired girl with nits: a poetic soul has rarely come better disguised.

Monday, April 11, 2016

The Complexity of Memory

In the case of each biographer, autobiographer, or memoirist, we have an experiencing self (the recorded self) and a remembering self (the recorder) acting on behalf of the individual or society.  There is always a gap between the two.

Remember Mary Karr and her experiment with her class.

Now listen to this psychologist:
https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_kahneman_the_riddle_of_experience_vs_memory?language=en

For Carl Jung the memory was embedded deep in a personal and collective psyche:
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=carl+jung+collective+unconscious+archetypes&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-001

A figure like Malcolm X both helps to shape culture and is a product of a violent cultural memory.  What is interesting about both the film and the autobiography is the way he is claimed as an international icon as well as the individual that emerges in the memories recorded.

How much of a sense of an individual do you get?

Malcolm and identity
You can’t hate the roots of a tree:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb-tjIUu0i4

Our history was destroyed by slaves:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENHP89mLWOY

Malcolm’s speech after returning from Mecca:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuHYZdf-ad0
--What point is he making about identity as it unfolds?

Obama on Malcolm X and identity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeDuOR6vkLM


Sunday, April 3, 2016

Malcolm X

There are many places to approach this complex figure, of course.  One is the posthumous claiming of him as a public figure.  I want to use this article as a starting point:

Still Reinventing Malcolm. By: JOSEPH, PENIEL E., Chronicle of Higher Education, 00095982, 5/6/2011, Vol. 57, Issue 35
Database: 
MasterFILE Elite

Still Reinventing Malcolm 



Listen
Malcolm X bestrides the postwar age of decolonization alongside global icons like Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi. If King and Gandhi evoked nonviolence and disciplined civil disobedience as a shield to protect the world from imperial wars, racism, and rampant materialism, Malcolmwielded the specter of self-defense, violence, and revolution as a sword to permanently alter power relations between the global North and South. In an epoch contoured by revolutions that connected local political struggles to national and international upheavals, he self-consciously brokered links among Africa, the Middle East, and America, setting the stage for political, religious, and cultural reverberations that would continue past his lifetime.
Almost a half-century after his death in 1965, Malcolm X continues to capture the global political imagination. His denunciations of white racism to packed Harlem crowds remain searing images that capture a specific style of black radicalism while simultaneously serving as a template for political revolutions that go beyond race and established the Third World as a bracingly independent geopolitical force. His speeches, political activism, and religious beliefs achieved mythic proportions after his death, spurred by the huge success of The Autobiography of Malcolm X, written in collaboration with Alex Haley and published posthumously. It remains a classic memoir of the once wayward youth's transformation from juvenile delinquent and criminal into the Nation of Islam's fiery national spokesman and, following a messy divorce from the group that would ultimately lead to his death, a radical human-rights advocate and Pan-Africanist who candidly admitted that some of his past views had been politically shortsighted, even reckless.
Embraced by Black Power activists, hip-hop artists, socialists, and black nationalists, Malcolm's iconography had been successfully rehabilitated enough by the 1990s to merit a major motion picture, an official U.S. postage stamp, and mainstream identification as King's angry but eloquent counterpart. Recognition came at a high cost. Despite a plethora of popular and scholarly works--on Malcolm's political and religious views, his life as hipster and hustler, his embrace of Pan-African impulses, his break with the Nation of Islam--a definitive scholarly biography illuminating his singular importance as a dominant 20th-century historical figure remained absent. For personal, financial, and political reasons, his widow and subsequently his estate restricted access to important archival material until 2008. His former associates were loath to give interviews, and the Nation of Islam remained mostly silent about the circumstances surrounding his death. The FBI and the New York City Police Department closed off thousands of pages of surveillance and wiretapping records. Then too, the success of the Autobiography as a literary memoir narrowed the opening for a scholarly biography.
Historical scholarship has focused on Malcolm's words of fire, depicting him more as a brilliant speaker than a community organizer. His supple intellect, burgeoning political ambitions, and organizing prowess have garnered far less attention. As have details of his private life. And no single volume has attempted to craft a cohesive portrait that stands outside the Autobiography's considerable shadow. In that celebrated book, Malcolm Xoutlined his views on the importance of producing an accurate history: "I've had enough of somebody else's propaganda," he proclaimed.
Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention (Viking), by Manning Marable, a historian at Columbia University who died just days before publication of what is clearly his life's work, achieves the rare feat of rescuing a man from his own mythology with deep archival research and brilliant insight. Marable's untimely death adds a layer of poignancy to a biography that will stand as the most authoritative account of Malcolm's life that will be written for a long time.
Marable emerged as one of the leading scholars of black Marxism and radicalism in the early 1980s. The founding director of Columbia's Institute for Research in African American Studies and a prolific scholar, his work charted the black-freedom movement's domestic and global reverberations. In books like Race, Reform, and Rebellion: The Second Reconstruction in Black America, 1945-1990 (second edition, University Press of Mississippi, 1991), African and Caribbean Politics: From Kwame Nkrumah to the Granada Revolution (Verso, 1987), and The Great Wells of Democracy: The Meaning of Race in America (Basic Books, 2002), he deftly explored the way postwar black radicals helped transform American democracy in the service of a human-rights movement that transcended borders and boundaries.
His commitment to black political empowerment went beyond the confines of academe, however, as he established an international network of contacts with activists and scholars throughout Africa, the Caribbean, and the larger Third World. Building enduring intellectual and institutional links between Harlem and Columbia--a hard-fought achievement in an Ivy League institution that has at times had a fraught relationship with the historically black neighborhood--he was the rare public intellectual willing to speak truth to power while using scholarship to transform society.
In Malcolm X, Marable found a perfect subject, one whose uncanny ability to reinvent himself during his prematurely short life and truncated public career touched upon themes of black political self-determination, economic justice, internationalism, and radical democracy represented in the scholar's own intellectual corpus.
Marable's subtitle, A Life of Reinvention, succinctly captures his book's larger effort to recast the political and personal life of the Black Power icon in both subtle and surprising ways. The Malcolm X revealed in these pages is at once a larger-than-life figure and a scaled-down, even frail human being. Marable refuses to shy away from Malcolm's flaws, candidly discussing his sexism, errors in political and personal judgment, and occasional anti-Semitic utterances. Suggestions, albeit based on circumstantial evidence, that Malcolm may have engaged in homosexual encounters during his time as a hustler promise to unleash renewed controversy about the identity of a man who adopted almost a dozen different names.
For scholars, if not the general public, Marable's Malcolm X now joins the Autobiography as an indispensable resource in comprehending Malcolm'scomplicated life. It not only "illustrates that many elements of Detroit Red's narrative are fictive," as Marable notes, referring to an early alias. More important, the book also offers the first accurate and in-depth chronology of a turbulent journey from criminal to icon. It shows us a man possessed of an uncanny ability both to absorb and project the sights and sounds of his surroundings, an aptitude that helped him convey a political and personal sincerity that has made him, till this day, perhaps the single most authentic leader that the black working class has produced.
Portions of the biography questioning Malcolm's sexuality and alleging an extramarital affair by his wife have already elicited controversy, including at least one critical review attacking Marable's research methods. Years in the making, Malcolm X is a thoroughly researched biography, mining a rich archive of primary sources (including many never accessed before) and collecting oral histories from Malcolm's associates and Nation of Islam officials (most notably Louis Farrakhan). Marable's discussion of Malcolm's at-times strained marriage relies on such oral histories and on personal correspondence from Malcolm to Elijah Muhammad, his mentor and the Nation's spiritual leader, which offer substantive evidence of a troubled union. That's also the kind of material undoubtedly painful for surviving family members. The even more controversial assertion that Malcolm may have participated in a homosexual business relationship with a white man who served as his sometimes benefactor rests on more slender evidence, which the author himself describes as "circumstantial." But such instances of interpretive overreach are scarce.
Racial politics formed part of Malcolm Little's birthright, an inheritance from his parents, Earl and Louise Little, two politically courageous supporters of Marcus Garvey--or, depending on your perspective, ill-fated pioneers of black nationalism--in the distant outpost of Omaha, Neb., where Malcolm was born on May 19, 1925. While Malcolm was still young, the family moved to Lansing, Mich. His was a difficult childhood, plagued by bouts of domestic violence, harassment from the local Klan, and Earl's gruesomely suspicious death (he was cut nearly in two by what white authorities claimed was a streetcar accident and Malcolm surmised was part of a lynching). Earl Little's death shattered his surviving family, hurling them into an emotionally fatiguing battle with state relief agencies that found the young Malcolm relying on foster care and eventually triggered Louise's mental breakdown and institutionalization. By 1941, Malcolm had moved to Boston to live with his older half-sister Ella. It was here that Malcolm Little first reinvented himself as a small-time hood whose crimes were at least partially inspired by Ella's own extralegal activities in pursuit of a middle-class lifestyle.
Marable deconstructs the the Legend of Detroit Red outlined in the Autobiography, finding that Malcolm purposely exaggerated his criminal exploits as a way of obscuring painful and embarrassing memories and of emphasizing the importance of the Nation of Islam in his eventual transformation. Far from being aligned with major gangsters, in this period Malcolm alternated between part-time legal employment like selling food on railroads (where he was known as Sandwich Red), dealing small amounts of marijuana to jazz musicians, and engaging in largely amateurish holdups, at least one of which ended in an early arrest. Successfully evading the draft by feigning mental illness, Malcolm engaged in escalating drug abuse and petty crime that ended abruptly shortly after World War II. Arrested in 1946 for a series of burglaries, fooled by false promises of leniency, he turned in his whole crew. The interracial makeup of the burglary ring, which included Malcolm's white girlfriend, inspired a harsh sentence of eight to 10 years.
Within the walls of Norfolk Prison Colony, in Massachusetts, Malcolm Little would reinvent himself again. Through letters from his brother Reginald, he was first introduced to the Nation of Islam, a religious nationalist sect whose emphasis on pride, self-respect, and discipline echoed his father's distant Garveyite preaching. Newly energized and clean and sober, Malcolm dove into a meticulous study of religion, history, and philosophy. Paroled in 1952, he quickly became a full-time Nation of Islam minister. Whereas Garvey resurrected ancient African kingdoms as proof of black nobility and self-respect, the Nation of Islam touted religious prophesy through an imaginative blend of Islam, black nationalism, and religious mythology that identified whites as "devils" and predicted America's destruction even as it embraced a conservative economic vision of black capitalism.
Reborn as Malcolm X, a surname that reflected black people's loss of identity in America's racial wilderness, the former Detroit Red now embraced personal self-discipline and an ascetic lifestyle. "The trickster disappeared," writes Marable, "leaving the willful challenger to authority." The biography weaves in new details to flesh out the narrative of Malcolm's becoming a minister and his rise to power within the Nation of Islam. He was an indefatigable organizer, whose remarkable ability to inspire new converts and recruits helped propel the Nation's tiny infrastructure into a formidable group with global ambitions.
But tensions cropped up early. One of the new biography's greatest strengths is in shaping a nuanced portrait of postwar Harlem as a city within a city, teeming with competing political, religious, and labor groups, self-appointed leaders, and deteriorating economic conditions, which helped the Nation of Islam tout itself as a haven for black men and women. Malcolm's extraordinary talent for "fishing" for new recruits outside of his fast-growing Harlem Temple No. 7 and his ability to successfully establish new temples in the North, South, and the West Coast between 1952 and 1962 marked him as Elijah Muhammad's most indispensable minister. It also made him enemies within the organization, especially among those connected by blood or marriage to Muhammad. Ultimately, even Malcolm's handpicked protégés would side against him in the aftermath of his split from the group, unexpected circumstances that he found bitterly disappointing.
According to Marable, Malcolm's poor choice of political allies within the Nation extended to his personal life and the fateful decision in 1958 to marry Betty Sanders, later renamed Betty Shabazz. In contrast to the loving, dutiful wife characterized in the Autobiography and 1992 film, Betty is depicted here as a stubborn, willful spouse who challenged Malcolm's patriarchal views of marriage and even engaged in an extramarital affair with one of his closest lieutenants--revelations that have understandably upset the Shabazz family. The couple endured rather than enjoyed each other's company over the course of a seven-year marriage, and Malcolm went so far as complaining to Muhammad in private correspondence of their sex life: "At a time when I was going all out to keep her satisfied (sexually), one day she told me that we were incompatible sexually because I had never given her any real satisfaction. From then on, try as I may, I began to become very cool toward her."
That quote, taken from a March 1959 letter barely a year after their wedding, powerfully illustrates that Malcolm's marriage to Betty was tense from almost the beginning; tensions were exacerbated by periods of prolonged absence, financial stress, and harassment from law enforcement and later the Nation of Islam. Despite sustained analysis of his personal life, the complex psychological reasons behind Malcolm's reticence toward emotional intimacy with Betty remain elusive, buried, it seems, beneath a disciplined exterior that Marable seems incapable of completely shattering. He makes an intriguing suggestion that Malcolm's past sexual history with prostitutes and fast women created a kind of emotional trauma that rendered him incapable of properly addressing Betty's "emotional and sexual needs"; it's only a hint, and it deserves more exploration.
All of the forces that had built Malcolm X seemed to speed up in the 1960s. Joint surveillance from the New York Police Department's Bureau of Special Services unit and the FBI added to Malcolm's increasingly complicated life, one that by 1960 included extensive speeches on the college lecture circuit, a popularity spurred by the previous year's documentary The Hate That Hate Produced, narrated by Mike Wallace. The film was dedicated more to sensationalism than journalism and characterized the Nation of Islam as akin to the Ku Klux Klan, but it cast Malcolm into the public eye.
Politics increasingly animated Malcolm's public speeches and organizing energies, a situation that created anxiety within the upper reaches of the Nation. His national notoriety announced Black Muslims as a kind of ghoulish counterpart to King and the Southern civil-rights movement's nonviolent demonstrations--even though Muhammad strictly forbade his group from engaging in secular political activity. Moreover, both Malcolm and Muhammad agreed that the Nation should be part of a global community of Islam, but the Messenger, as Muhammad was known, sought recognition from orthodox Muslims in the Middle East to reinforce his standing at home, while Malcolm hoped that the entire group might join in a secular civil-rights movement.
While Marable shows that the Nation's internal decision-making process, including formalizing a nonaggression pact with the American Nazi Party and George Lincoln Rockwell, pained Malcolm, his portrait does not shy away from Malcolm's own culpability in constructing an elaborate and eventually deadly cult of personality around the Messenger that brooked no internal criticism and meted out violence to dissenters. By the early 1960s, the Fruit of Islam had emerged as a powerful arbiter of physical violence within the Nation, a group implicitly sanctioned by Malcolm that would emerge as a deadly adversary after his break from the Nation.
Malcolm's circle was changing. Against the backdrop of the civil-rights movement, his radical call for black political self-determination struck a chord in urban black militants discontented with nonviolence yet skeptical of Muhammad's claim to divinity. A diverse network of activists, entertainers, and celebrities like Sidney Poitier, Ossie Davis, and Ruby Dee, and elected leaders like Adam Clayton Powell Jr., formed alliances with Malcolm. His secular ambitions found him balancing on an increasingly perilous tightrope: implicitly sponsoring the kind of robust political activity Muhammad considered taboo while maintaining a public, almost fawning fealty to a religious sect he was intellectually outgrowing. Zesty debates with the nonviolent guru Bayard Rustin, the writer James Baldwin, and the leader of the Congress of Racial Equality, James L. Farmer Jr., quickly turned into more-intimate friendships, a pattern replicated with journalists like Louis Lomax and Alex Haley. Collectively, such people first challenged and then helped propel Malcolm into a more activist posture. "He seemed more than ever of two minds" during the early years of the Kennedy administration, Marable writes, "pulled both by his loyalty to Muhammad and by a need to engage in the struggle."
In 1963, the year that civil-rights demonstrations in Birmingham and the March on Washington captured the world's collective imagination--and the Nation of Islam was quashing scandalous accusations regarding the Messenger's sexual misconduct--Malcolm X became the Nation's national minister. On November 10, he delivered his famous Message to the Grassroots, brandishing revolution as the antidote to racial oppression to sympathetic militants in Detroit who imagined him the leader of an as-yet-unnamed movement that would both parallel and intersect the civil-rights struggle.
Throughout the year, Malcolm had blasted President Kennedy's reluctance to defend black citizenship in the face of German shepherds and fire hoses in Alabama, even as he recoiled at King's use of children in demonstrations that erupted into violence. Unwisely, in December, he continued his blistering criticism, in flagrant violation of Muhammad's explicit orders to remain silent. Malcolm's "chickens coming home to roost" sound bite in response to a reporter's question about Kennedy's death sought to illustrate the boomerang effect of American violence, but quickly became engulfed in conjecture as to whether the Nation rejoiced in the death of the president. Malcolm's enemies in the Nation pounced, prodding Muhammad to discipline his wayward prodigy. What began as a three-month suspension turned into an organizational rout and whispers of assassination plots.
Banished from the Nation, Malcolm reinvented himself once again, this time as an independent, radical political activist and religious apostate. Marable's biography offers the most detailed examination yet of the final, exhilaratingly frenetic year of Malcolm's life: one in which he founded two short-lived religious and political organizations; spent 24 weeks in Africa; reimagined his understanding of revolution; embraced orthodox Sunni Islam; and networked with African and Middle-Eastern rulers in an effort to leverage revolutionary political struggles back home.
Shortly after his departure from the Nation, Malcolm delivered his famous "The Ballot or the Bullet" speech, in which he touted a vision of radical democracy. But he remained an unapologetic political combatant, offering the ballot as a rapprochement with politics, while reminding listeners that the bullet might well remain the ultimate arbiter of America's historical racial divide. The speech also emphasized his longstanding belief in racial solidarity and united-front politics, sentiments often obscured by impassioned polemics, Marable shows us.
Malcolm's hajj to the holy city of Mecca that April culminated in another transformation: The sectarian religious warrior now embraced a universal vision of Islam that transcended race, geography, and ideology in favor of what Marable calls a new "role as a kind of evangelist," capable of fusing revolutionary politics and religion as part of a global human-rights effort. Malcolm's travel diaries, revealed for the first time in this biography, reflect the contemplative thoughts of a man of war who had at last found peace. "There is no greater serenity of mind," he wrote, "than when one can shut the hectic noise and pace of the materialistic outside world, and seek inner peace within oneself." Africa also offered festivities, including meetings with Nigeria's Azikiwe and Ghana's Nkrumah, before returning home for a scarcely two-month effort to put together the Organization of Afro-American Unity, a secular attempt to expand support beyond disgruntled Muslims and loyalists who formed Malcolm's relatively small political base.
~~~~~~~~
By July he was off again for an extended stay in Africa, where he became intimately acquainted with the strengths and limitations of Pan-African politics, found small joys in sightseeing and drinking alcohol for the first time in many years, and basked in the luxurious hospitality of being recognized as an official guest of state in many countries. That summer and fall, he experienced a sense of freedom, energy, and spiritual renewal that made this period one of the happiest in his life. Collectively, Malcolm's three trips to Africa and the Middle East represent a stunning level of international engagement that Marable argues produced tangible religious and political alliances that disturbed the State Department and outraged Nation of Islam officials. Politically, these trips provided a blueprint for a subsequent generation of radical activists, most notably Stokely Carmichael, who would (sometimes consciously) retrace Malcolm's itinerary, en route to fashioning their own global political identities.
Malcolm returned to the States under the threat of a death sentence by the Nation. Marable painstakingly dissects Malcolm's February 21, 1965, assassination, arguing that two of the three convicted assassins were absent from the Audubon Ballroom at the time of the murder and making a compelling and detailed case for the ways in which the New York police's botched investigation allowed four guilty conspirators (including Malcolm'smain shooter) to go free. The person Marable names as the alleged assassin currently lives in Newark and denies any involvement in Malcolm's death. Marable accessed thousands of new FBI, CIA, and other surveillance and informant files under the Freedom of Information Act, but the issue will remain open until all the relevant files have been found and released.
Marable takes pains to illustrate that the iconography in Haley's Autobiography at times presumptuously crafted an image of Malcolm in line with Haley's own political views as a liberal Republican--and one apt to sell commercially. The Autobiography sanitized Malcolm's radical politics by tacking on an introduction by a New York Times writer and an epilogue by Haley himself, even as it excised three chapters originally designed to showcase Malcolm's new political philosophy.
A self-made political leader, Malcolm "keenly felt, and expressed, the varied emotions and frustrations of the black poor and working class," Marable reminds us. In that he became the avatar of not only a domestic movement for racial justice, but a symbol of an international human-rights movement, one that crossed religious and racial boundaries and transcended geographical and ideological restrictions. Yet for all of his efforts at reinvention, Malcolm X remained at his core "a black man, a person of African descent who happened to be a United States citizen."
One of the many pleasures of Marable's Malcolm X is its ability to reveal the sights and sounds of black America's postwar freedom surge, a time marked by the exhilarating sounds of bebop, the internal migration of rural Southern blacks to the urban North, and escalating racial protest against Jim Crow. Tellingly, jazz musicians and entertainers were attracted to Malcolm and the Nation of Islam. Malcolm's own powerful rhetoric contained jazz flourishes and clipped, at times improvised, passages that attested to his time around musicians as a young man.
More than 45 years after his death, we now have a historical portrait of Malcolm X that goes beyond literary clichés and autobiographical fictions to reveal an all-too human man beset by personal trials and political tribulations that would have felled the less courageous. Stripped from the cocoon of his posthumous aura of invincibility, Malcolm X emerges from these pages an endlessly fascinating and protean figure whose shortcomings make his political accomplishments all the more remarkable. Against the backdrop of private disappointments and embarrassingly public betrayals, Marable reminds us that Malcolm X still managed to transform "the discourse and politics of race internationally," a final enduring reinvention that continues long after his death.
PHOTO (BLACK & WHITE): Malcolm X on his way to attend a 1964 meeting of the Organization of African Unity
PHOTO (COLOR): Marable, a historian at Columbia U., died in April, just before his biography of Malcolm X was published.
~~~~~~~~
By PENIEL E. JOSEPH
Peniel E. Joseph is a professor of history at Tufts University. His most recent book is Dark Days, Bright Nights: From Black Power to Barack Obama (Basic Civitas, 2010).

The Chronicle of Higher Education: (http://chronicle.com.ezproxy.gsu.edu) 1-800-728-2803 Copyright of Chronicle of Higher Education is the property of Chronicle of Higher Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.



W. E. B. Du Bois's ideas about double consciousness provide a useful way of thinking about Malcolm X:

"The Veil" and "Double Consciousness" 
         In The Souls of Black Folk, arguably W.E.B. DuBois’ most famous work, he introduces and addresses two concepts that describe the quintessential Black experience in America— the concepts of “the veil” and “double-consciousness.”  Though DuBois uses these terms separately, their meanings and usage in his works are deeply intertwined.  These two concepts gave a name to what so many African-Americans felt but previously could not express due to a lack of words to accurately describe their pain.  The implication and connotation of these words were far-reaching because not only did it succinctly describe the plight of being Black and American then, it rings true to the core and essence of what it means to still be Black and American today.
         For DuBois, the veil concept primarily refers to three things.  First, the veil suggests to the literal darker skin of Blacks, which is a physical demarcation of difference from whiteness.  Secondly, the veil suggests white people’s lack of clarity to see Blacks as “true” Americans.  And lastly, the veil refers to Blacks’ lack of clarity to see themselves outside of what white America describes and prescribes for them.
        Any socially-aware, present-day African-American has had at least two life-altering experiences in life— the moment he/she realized he/she was Black, and the moment when he/she realized that was a problem.  Like DuBois, many African-Americans can pinpoint the exact instance at which both of these life altering encounters took place, and they too came to this realization at a young age.  For DuBois, these realizations came during a youthful ball, at which his card was “peremptorily” refused by a Southern, white girl simply (or rather, not so simply) because he was Black.  Of this encounter he writes the following:
    Then it dawned upon me with a certain suddeness that I was different from the others; or like [them perhaps] in heart and
    life and longing, but shut out from their world by a vast veil.  I had thereafter no desire to tear down that veil, to creep
    through; I held all beyond it in common contempt, and lived above it in a region of blue sky and great wandering shadows.
        In this passage, DuBois’ initial reaction upon realizing that being Black was a “problem” in American society is interesting because this same sentiment is commonly felt by African-Americans today.  In addition, DuBois’ reactionary feeling of contempt for all white people on the other side of the veil reveals a larger point about the veil concept.  Because many people only understand DuBois’ veil concept to mean that white people’s view of Black people is obstructed by this not-so-invisible veil that hangs between the races, many forget to see that this lack of vision is two-fold; that is, just as the white girl looking through the veil could not properly see DuBois for who he was beyond his skin, he in turn could not clearly see the whole white race because of his one negative encounter with her as well, which he then projected onto the entire white race.
        Although there is a veil that shades the view of both Blacks and Whites, the reason why Blacks traditionally have a better understanding of whites than the reverse is because of this “two-ness” lived and felt by Black Americans.  In other words, upon coming to the realization of being Black and what that has historically meant in America (or arguably presently means in America), Black people have long known how to operate in two Americas— one that is white and one that is Black.  DuBois describes this phenomena as “double-consciousness”, which is the awareness of the “two-ness” of being “an American and a[n African-American]”, and the largely unconscious, almost instinctive movement between the these two identities, as needed.
         DuBois describes African-Americans as “a sort of seventh son, born with a veil, and gifted with second-sight in this American world— a world which yields him no true self-consciousness, but only lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world.”  Further, of the actual concept of “double-consciousness”, DuBois goes on to say the following:
    It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others, of
    measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity.  One ever feels his two-ness— an
    American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose
    dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder.
        This passage is perhaps the most powerfully written, (and amazingly accurate for some) of the sheer burden of being Black and American in this society.  Although written over a century ago, for many modern-day African-Americans this passage is a reflection of how very little has changed in America’s conceptualization of what is “Black” and of what is “American”.  But more importantly, for African-Americans it is an illustration and reminder of how far they still have to go.